Disclaimer: We are shareholders of Argentex.
Elevator pitch:
Argentex delivers tailored foreign exchange (“FX”) advisory and execution services to UK corporates engaging in non-speculative, commercial currency transactions. As a riskless principal broker, the company only acts as an intermediary and makes money on the spread between the rate it executes the trade at and the one passed on to the client. It has a market capitalization of GBP140m and generates GBP29m of revenues from spot, forwards and options. Banks have 85%+ of the market today but this is eroding fast: FX is a marginal vertical for them – most of their money is made on equity/debt raise and M&A – and therefore client service is poor (FX desks are cut every year) and pricing uncompetitive (150 bps for a spot trade vs. 20bps at Argentex). As one of the best capitalized independent FX broker in the UK (GBP20m net cash as of Sept-20) and with a large, highly incentivized salesforce, we think Argentex can disproportionately benefit from this market share shift and grow at 25%+ p.a. for at least the next 5 years. Argentex’s economics are excellent, with 40%+ EBIT margins and 90%+ ROIC (adjusted for cash required for collateral purposes during the year). With little need for capital reinvestment, we think the company has a clear path to a 29% FCF CAGR, reaching GBP 38.8m by March 2026. Applying an 8% FCF to EV yield leads to an intrinsic value of GBPx 510 per share, or a 33.1% IRR on capital invested from current levels (GBPx 122 per share). Additionally, the company has just entered the European and Australian markets, providing for material upside optionality if it can replicate its model successfully. Finally, insider ownership is high with the three Founding Partners owning 25% of the company. They have significant knowledge and experience in FX markets and are all involved in the day-to-day operations of the business (2 co-CEOs and 1 Managing director).
1- Company Description & Addressable Market
Argentex traded in 2019 a notional FX amount of GBP12bn (95% was EUR, USD or GBP) with 1,200 corporates active in the broad array of the economy (see on the right). The typical client has an annual requirement to convert between GBP1m and GBP500m of currencies. Importantly, sales are predominantly recurring since importers/exporters have an almost constant need to exchange currencies throughout the year every time they ship/receive products/raw materials.While 64% of notional FX traded was spot and 36% was forwards, the
latter carries higher spreads (c.30 bps vs. spot at c.17bps) and therefore sales
are more balanced with a split between spot, forwards and options at 46%, 48%
and 6%, respectively.
Additionally, it is important to understand that Argentex only acts
as a pure intermediary for its clients and therefore does not actively trade on
the market nor make directional bets on currencies. It only makes money
from the spread between the rate it executes the trade at its institutional
counterparty and the rate it passes on to the client.
How big is
the UK FX market and what is the relevant TAM for Argentex?
Establishing
an accurate addressable market is difficult as the company targets a subset of
the UK corporate world. However, the following sets of numbers directionally show
how big the market is and highlight the large runaway of market share gains
Argentex enjoys.
A recent
survey from the Bank of England[1]
stated that the average daily volume of FX traded through London is over GBP2.0
trillion of which c.GBP670m is non-interbank spot and forward trades. This same survey estimates that c.85% of
UK SME and corporate clients continue to use clearing banks as their main
provider of foreign exchange services. As Argentex’s average daily trading
volume is GBP46m, this would represent a global market share of 0.007% or
0.046% of the non-bank sub-segment.
However, the
ONS estimates that the total value of goods and services imported and exported
to and from the UK in 2019 was c.GBP1.4tn, implying a daily volume of GBP5.4bn.
We believe that the ONS statistic represents a better proxy of Argentex’s TAM
as the Company only deals with clients that engage in commercial FX
transactions. As a result, we estimate that Argentex’s market share is
c.0.9% (GBP46m of average daily trading volume in 2019).
2-
Moat
and Financial Snapshot
We believe that Argentex has 5 key attractions for clients, which put
together will allow the company to disproportionately benefit from the shift
away from banks and retain its clients.
Ø Unmatched Service and Proactivity
The typical Argentex client or prospect does not have a treasury
department and its CFO/treasurer is actively looking for service or advice. Simply
put, they like to speak to someone before putting on a GBP10m trade. Banks do
not fit the bill as they typically offer poor service (FX desks are
understaffed and the first victim of cost cutting initiatives) and cannot provide
advisory services (banking regulations). On the other hand, Argentex only
has 1,200 clients and can therefore approach them on a case-by-case basis and provides
a degree of service and proactivity that is unmatched[2].
This high-level service results in many clients using Argentex as their sole FX
providers. We expect that for clients using multiple providers, this will
result in wallet share gains over the long-term.
To this end, Argentex decided not to operate a 360 model (like most alternative FX providers). Instead, the salesforce is only focused on new customer acquisition while traders oversee the day-to-day relationship with existing clients. Also, we very much appreciate Argentex’s remuneration policy in that regard and think it fosters both a strong sense of loyalty as well as client-centricity among its employees:
- The salesforce is paid 10% to 17% (depending on new business acquisition targets) of the revenues generated by an acquired client over the lifetime of the business relationship;
- Traders are paid 10% of the revenues generated by a client.
Overall, Argentex attracts clients that predominantly value the
company’s advisory services and proactivity. For this reason, we believe that
pricing pressure is unlikely as the client perceives the spread as compensation
for the advisory service, not only for the execution. Additionally, this
protects Argentex from fintech FX startups, who propose a do-it-yourself
approach to SMEs. We do not believe that “unsophisticated” clients will want to
trade forward contracts by themselves or trade even a couple of millions worth
of GBP/EUR/USD in spot contracts without getting some advice first.
Ø Low Prices
We estimate that on top of a better service, customers switching to
Argentex can cut their FX costs 5 to 10-fold. Indeed, banks generally
charge between 100bps and 200bps on spot transactions whereas Argentex only charges
c.20bps. A similar difference holds true for forwards. Interestingly,
prospective clients generally do not know the extent of banks’ spreads since
pricing is very opaque and this is a key element of the sales pitch. For them, switching
to alternative FX providers such as Argentex can yield significant and
immediate improvement in margins.
Case Study (1/2):
Let us take a UK corporate with a 15% EBIT margin that exports 50% of its goods
and imports 50% of its raw materials from Europe. Assuming all FX transactions
are made with spot contracts, the following table shows that switching from
banks charging 100bps and 200bps to Argentex’s 20bps will improve margins by 74bps
to 165bps and increase EBIT between 5% and 12%.
Trust is key in this business given the critical nature of the service
provided and while the significant savings entailed by the first switch to an
alternative FX provider more than justify the “risk”, we believe that the
rewards from switching to a cheaper alternative, once pricing is already at
20bps, is immaterial and clients are therefore extremely sticky.
Case Study (2/2):
The following table shows the impact on margin and EBIT of a switch from Argentex
to another alternative FX provider charging only 10bps.
Ø Strong reputation and highly engaged salesforce
As we mentioned previously, trust is key and Argentex benefits from a strong reputation and a long-standing track-record of operations. In addition, we believe that its listing (IPO in June 2019) significantly improved awareness among prospective clients and that it makes them more inclined to deal with Argentex since they can check the company’s financial health. Interestingly, Argentex’s institutional counterparties decreased their initial collateral requirements following the IPO as they gained more confidence in the company’s financial position.
Moreover, Argentex puts a big emphasis on the quality of its sales force
because while lower prices and good service are part of the client’s acquisition
equation, the real tipping point always comes down to the salesman. For this
reason, the company hires 10 new graduates every 6 months that it tightly integrates
within its experienced sales force. This allows best practice sharing among the
new hires and a training from the ground up to the Argentex-way. Indeed, co-CEO
Carl Jani stresses the need to “be genuine” and to take pride in the value the
product brings to the client. As a result, the company strongly discourages “product-pushing”
and will only sell to the client what it needs, and not more exotic (and higher
spread!) products.
Ø Fortress Balance Sheet
The company was GBP13m net cash at H1’21 (Sept-2020), excluding our
estimate of the cash required for collateral purposes. We believe this is a
strong attraction to clients wanting to avoid FX providers that could go under
pressure while they have outstanding contracts with them.
Additionally, FX trading requires cash on the balance sheet for
collateral purposes and this acts as a significant barrier to entry. It takes
around GBP2m of cash to trade GBP3bn of FX (our estimate following conversation
with management). Replicating Argentex current GBP12bn footprint would therefore
require at least GBP8m of cash on the balance sheet.
Importantly, the comfortable cash position allows the company to take
advantage of volatile market activities when other providers retreat. Argentex
can then step up to underwrite more transactions and therefore gain market
share. Case in point: March was the
best performing month of 2020 when Argentex collected GBP5m of revenues versus
GBP1.5m in August (GBP29m for the entire year).
Ø Regulation
While the industry is not heavily regulated, getting certifications is
still an additional barrier to entry (time and energy consuming). Alternative FX
providers need to be approved by the FCA in the UK as well as comply with MIFID
2.
To recap, these 5 key attractions constitute a powerful cocktail that
translated into 30%+ p.a. top line growth over the past 5 years, 40%+ EBIT
margins and triple digit returns on capital employed (adjusted for the cash
required for collateral purposes).
3-
A
Management Team with Skin in The Game
The three founding partners own 25% of the company, representing GBP34.0m at GBX 122 per share.
They are involved in the day-to-day operations of the business and have
extensive experience of FX markets. Additionally, Sir John Beckwith’s
Pacific Investments Group owns 12.5% of the capital, after having funded
and backed the group since its creation in 2012. The company is currently chaired
by Sir Digby Jones, a British businessman and politician who has served as
Minister of State for Trade and
Investment between 2007 and 2008.
Management has gone through the Euro crisis, Brexit and now COVID so it understands
very well that the FX business can be volatile in the short-term. It therefore prefers
to spend its time focusing on how to best position Argentex for the next 5-10 years.
This focus is rather evident from two main decisions taken this year:
-
Management
decided to move into a bigger office and to keep hiring its salesforce cohort
last summer, even if it puts profitability under pressure for the year;
-
Management
rejected many trades from prospects and clients that were not considered strong
enough to withstand COVID. Doing so would have helped increase sales (and the
share price) in the short term but at the cost of putting Argentex in jeopardy
in the longer-term if the client went under.
In an industry where risk management and discipline are paramount, we therefore
feel in particularly good hands with Argentex’s owner-operator founders.
4-
Valuation
We expect the company to keep taking market share from banks in the
years to come, which should largely support the company’s ambition of c.25-30%
top line growth per year. This leads us to sales of GBP102m revenues in 2026
(23.4% CAGR) on FX volumes of GBP45.7bn. This would imply a 3.3% market share
based on the ONS numbers assuming no growth in the economy by 2026. The cost
base is almost entirely variable (commissions account for 65% of total OPEX)
and we therefore expect EBITDA margins to grow from 48.0% to 49.6% during the
period and absolute EBITDA to reach GBP50.7m (the margin declines in 2021 as
the activity temporarily retreats while Argentex continues to recruit new salespeople
and moves its HQ to a bigger location).
Argentex owns its technological IT platform and does not capitalize much
R&D OPEX so we expect CAPEX to stay at around GBP2.5m per year. At the
Company’s 19% tax rate, this leads to a free cash flow pre and post-interest
(there is no debt) of GBP38.8m (28.7% CAGR).
Applying a conservative 8% FCF to Enterprise Value gives us a target
Enterprise Value of GBP485m in 2026. Due to its high cash conversion profile,
we expect Argentex’s net cash position to reach GBP139m by 2026, of which GBP94m
will be available to shareholders (we consider the other GBP45m as restricted
cash used to fund potential collateral payments). This leads to a target
Market Capitalization of GBP578m, or GBPx510 per share. We therefore expect an
investment at current prices of GBPx122 to generate a 33.1% IRR over the next 5
years.
5- Risks
Given the highly concentrated nature of our portfolio, we focus a lot on
what could go wrong and how it could lead to permanent loss of capital, which
is why we spent a significant amount of time considering the key risks related
to this investment.
Bankruptcies of top end-customers
-
As a
riskless principal broker, the company is not exposed to customer bankruptcy
per se, but to the following scenario: a big customer going bankrupt with an
ongoing forward trade and at the same time an adverse move in the underlying currency.
If this happened, Argentex would immediately ‘cancel’ the trade by booking an
equal and opposite trade with its institutional counterparties. Argentex would however
be on the hook for the losses created by the adverse currency move.
Ex: A client with a GBP100m forward contract goes
bankrupt. The underlying currency moves against the client by 10% on the same
day. Argentex ‘cancels” the trade as described above and limits further damage.
However, the company is on the hook for c.GBP10m, i.e. the GBP100m notional
times the adverse currency move (10%).
- Risk
management is therefore at the core of what the company does. This starts pre-trade, with not chasing what
Carl Jani refers to as “dirty revenues” and be willing to sacrifice short-term
financial performance for the long-term health of the business. Management’s first
question when looking at a deal is “does this have the potential to hurt us?”. Additionally,
a lot of time is spent assessing the creditworthiness of each client and the
company will require up-to-date financials from them when they want to put on a
big trade. The company also has strong risk parameters regarding its exposure
to a limited number of clients or industries.
Ex: During the summer of 2020, it could have done a deal with a retailer
and taken £2m for £200m underlying currency, which would have shown stronger H1’20
results. It did not and the retailer is now bankrupt. The company would have
been in a more precarious situation if it accepted the deal.
- Post
trade, Argentex will do daily sensitivity analysis on the top 20 “most at risk”
clients and simulate diverse currency scenarios. It will also look at its
overall currency exposure to see where traders can be more lenient on
collateral requirement or on the contrary where they need to be strict.
Damage of reputation due to poor client services or KYC procedures
- As
explained previously, reputation is paramount in this industry and one of the
competitive advantages of independent FX providers is better client service
compared to institutional banks;
- Poor
client services arising from incorrect trade execution, human error, trader’s
unavailability to answer queries on time could have a severe negative effect on
the company’s reputation and on its activity. Indeed, as the famous saying goes
“it takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it”;
- Argentex
is still a nascent company in this industry and sometimes gets referenced to
other clients by word of mouth. Even a tiny portion of clients being
unsatisfied can have a snowball effect and therefore impact the growth of the
company;
- In
parallel, poor KYC procedures leading to some client bankruptcies, while
limited, can spread negative sentiments (even unjustified) around the solidity
of the business.
Poor integration of new recruits
-
Because the
salesforce is key in bringing in new clients, recruits need to be trained and reach
the skill level of the experienced salesforce for the business to achieve its
growth targets. Indeed, as the following charts shows, as recruits gain
experience, they become better at acquiring clients;
-
However,
training from scratch a new batch of recruits every 6 months (a work done by
the co-CEO and the experienced salesforce) requires time, energy, patience, and
salary expenses without the guarantee of success. As a result, it can disturb
the work organization of experienced team members as they need to allocate time
between training and sourcing new prospects;
-
While we
welcome the quasi-constant arrival of fresh and motivated young graduates, we
also consider it as a risk that Argentex will need to take into account if it
wants to optimize its growth prospects without impacting the current solidity
of its team.
Appendix 1
Some examples from our research:
-
Traders
usually find out the rates at which clients are interested in or the day
clients like to trade and call them before they have to;
- Argentex
will sometimes charge less than it could on a specific trade to keep a good
relationship (whereas bank pricing is largely based on mechanical grid prices);
-
Flexibility
over settlement payment: bank will charge corporates a lot if they do not pay
at settlement whereas Argentex will be more flexible;
- Argentex
will also be more flexible around the corporate structure: SPV for instance are
rejected by banks for FX services although they are backed by massive PE firms.
[1] Link to the press release: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/markets/london-foreign-exchange-joint-standing-committee/results-of-the-semi-annual-fx-turnover-survey-october-2018
[2] See Appendix 1
Is there a reason to get excited about this now?
ReplyDeleteIs Record Plc a suitable peer for Argentex?
ReplyDeleteRecord Plc is experiencing a strong re-rating right now, while Argentex is not impacted so far.
Is Record Plc a suitable peer for Argentex?
ReplyDeleteRecord Plc is experiencing a strong re-rating right now, while Argentex is not impacted so far.
Hey man, thanks for the write up. Our small partnership has invested in AGFX.
ReplyDeleteWhat are your takes on those:
- bad press about Henry
- Digby has missed compliance and a former company, where he was sitting in the board, wenn bankrupt after a fraud
- did you speak to employees of alpha fx about differences? There are some things I got concerned about.
You find my write up here: http://investmentideen.com/?p=338&lang=en
DeleteWhat differences did you find when you spoke to employees? I see no reason why AGFX should trade at such a discount to alpha
DeleteSeeing the latest investor call, some thoughts from me:
ReplyDeletePassing mention of high attrition rate among sales staff, probably the driver for the 'pod' reorganisation they trialled.
Detail on software in the appendix was quite impressive, personal experience tells me that really high quality system integration like they claim is a massive, massive driver of productivity, and very difficult for rivals to imitate.
The news from Netherlands not great - my read is that they are having to reinvest in their online offer because the old high service model (where their competitive advantage lies) isn't what the Dutch wnat.
Overall - pretty positive set of results - I added after the investor call.
당신의 블로그의 다음 업데이트를 계속 체크 아웃하기를 기대합니다.
ReplyDelete외환거래
Met Glass / Glass solar modules and panels
ReplyDeleteGlass glass solar module is a long lasting and ultra resistant to any weather conditions Building Integrated Photovoltaics solution. BIPV solar panels can be used as an additional power source and alternative material in architecture to achieve future design for a comparable to standard materials price.
https://metsolar.eu/